|
|
Post by masterm - former HOU on Mar 4, 2008 19:46:22 GMT -5
so what do u guys think about the new ratings? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Mar 4, 2008 19:53:40 GMT -5
Overall they were okay but you had some DROPS.
#1 Andre Bynum is hurt and he is a 78? There are others, like what you did to Mourning, D12 shouldn't be THAT high, Paul should be higher, but overall it was pretty good. I give you a C.
PS. the Nene thing is bullshit, the dude has cancer.
|
|
|
|
Post by masterm - former HOU on Mar 4, 2008 19:53:49 GMT -5
please comment about your vote
|
|
|
|
Post by masterm - former HOU on Mar 4, 2008 19:54:37 GMT -5
Overall they were okay but you had some DROPS. #1 Andre Bynum is hurt and he is a 78? There are others, like what you did to Mourning, D12 shouldn't be THAT high, Paul should be higher, but overall it was pretty good. I give you a C. PS. the Nene thing is bullnuts, the dude has cancer. Bynum is hurt so he shouldnt go higher? he was a monster and was doing GREAT for the laker....he was really underrated at 68... |
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Mar 4, 2008 19:56:06 GMT -5
Maybe but he's a 78...Centers aren't rated very high so he is top 10 now? No way, Farmar should probably be a 73 or 74 and Bynum a 70-72.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Mar 4, 2008 20:07:17 GMT -5
Maybe but he's a 78...Centers aren't rated very high so he is top 10 now? No way, Farmar should probably be a 73 or 74 and Bynum a 70-72. I am sorry but have you been living under a rock when the NBA season started. SEASON AVERAGES Season Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG 07-08 LAL 35 25 28.8 0.636 0.000 0.695 3.0 7.2 10.2 1.7 0.3 2.1 1.49 2.80 13.1 on top of that Bynum already has 16 double-double and he only played 35 games, if he played till this point, he would prolly have 30-40 double-double games. and he is still leading the league in FG percentage. |
|
|
|
Post by masterm - former HOU on Mar 4, 2008 20:12:04 GMT -5
as much as I hate LAL he is right...
|
|
|
|
Post by enfantterrible - DET on Mar 4, 2008 20:26:48 GMT -5
overall statement: its all about individual ratings!!!!!!! not overall...
(for example Boozer is a great scorer, good rebounder, but thats it...he isnt fast, doesnt block shots, doesnt defend good, cant dribble, doesnt pass; he still is a dominat big man but his overall shouldnt be higher than 85!)
-- Howard is way too high...he has great individual ratings, but he will grow fast but not like that...
-- AK isnt a 20-10 man, but he has good ratings in every category...6 point drop??? He is a player who doesnt look good with ratings (like Randolph) and AK EVEN IS PLAYIN BETTER THAN LAST YEAR!!! please correct that!
-- both O'neal's are still too high...they are so slow and weak
-- Deng is too high too...look at CHI in the weak east...Deng is 80 but not more
|
|
|
|
Post by washington - former WAS on Mar 4, 2008 20:28:16 GMT -5
What mamba said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Mar 4, 2008 22:47:24 GMT -5
Actually gonna agree with Detroit on this, except he forgot to mention Chris Paul ;-)
overall the ratings are pretty good, but I agree there were a few players who didn't really make sense. If I had to give a grade probably a B- or so cuz most of it is self explanatory...just have to take the time to do it. On this scale I'll give it a "fair enough" but add a "with some problems that should be fixed" to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Mar 16, 2008 17:14:43 GMT -5
What is wrong with Chris Paul's rating? Is there more than one or two PG's rated higher? No. How can you complain about that?
Deng has been playing much better than last year when he was healthy so he did deserve a bump. Plus you have to look at similar players' ratings at their respective positions. It would be a lot more work and much more time consuming if we adjusted a player like Boozer to 85 overall and then had to bring down every other top 20 PF b/c of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Mar 16, 2008 20:55:05 GMT -5
I think Steve Francis got ripped....he should be at least an 80 ; )
|
|
