|
Post by masterm - former HOU on Nov 8, 2009 20:29:55 GMT -5
Offer: 1,000,000 for 2 years
Year 1 = 500,000 Year 2= 500,000 (PO)
Totals:
09/10 = 48,515,000 10/11= 23,335,000
Hill would be our 6th man, his experience would be a nice weapon in the race for the title.We add a PO in the final year in case that he wants to try something new
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 8, 2009 20:37:04 GMT -5
The New Jersey Nets would like to offer Mr. Hill...
09/10: $1,000,000 10/11: $1,500,000 11/12: $2,000,000 (team option)
3 years / $4,500,000
Mr. Hill will be a vital player on a young team hoping to make a major jump this year. He would be either the 6th or 7th man and see a lot of minutes as his versatility is much needed. His addition would make the Nets bench even more formidable and depending on how the other offers turn out he may be starting for this team at SF.
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Nov 8, 2009 20:40:43 GMT -5
The Dallas Mavericks would like to offer Grant Hill a 3 year deal worth $1,500,000
Year 1: $500,000 Year 2: $500,000 Year 3: $500,000
Team Salary per year without Hill, with all options picked up 2009- $55,171,886 2010- $50,929,013 2011- $22,317,735
We would love to have Grant on our team as a strong veteran presence. He will come off the bench and add that extra scoring punch when it is needed. He will be on a talentful team and will have a chance at winning himself a championship in Dallas
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Nov 8, 2009 20:41:06 GMT -5
Grant would like to see a little bit more money up front. He feels he still has a lot to offer and is looking for a contract in the $3M salary annually.
|
|
|
Post by oden52 - former CLE on Nov 8, 2009 21:51:43 GMT -5
The Cavaliers would like to offer Grant an offer of:
2009/2010: $2,500,001 2010/2011: $2,750,000 2011/2012: $3,000,000 2012/2013: $3,500,000
Total: $11,750,001 MLE Used
09/10 Total Salary: $70,983,633 10/11 Total Salary: $65,849,553 11/12 Total Salary: $36,800,000 12/13 Total Salary: $24,500,000
Mr. Hill would most likely come in and start at SG for us. Our team lacks veteran leadership, and Grant definitely provides that for our team to compete this year. His ability to start at SG completes our starting lineup, moving J.R. Smith to the bench to play a 6th man role. Grant gets the option to leave after a year if our competitiveness does not live up to its capability, and if he wants to move on to bigger and better things.
Priority List: Wilson Chandler - Grant Hill
|
|
|
Post by humongousgravy - former PHL on Nov 9, 2009 2:23:51 GMT -5
The Sixers would like Mr Hill to know that they are willing to make a play for him if they do not get their main man, Wilson Chandler this off-season. We are hoping that Mr Hill will delay his decision making a little.
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 11, 2009 9:18:10 GMT -5
The OKC Thunder would like to offer Grant Hill a 3 year deal using our MLE. Grant would come in as our starting SF on a veteran team that is poised to compete for the championship this season.
Year 1 $3,800,000 MLE Year 2 $2,800,000 Year 3 $2,000,000
Total $8,600,000
Priority: Villanueva, Anderson, Hill
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Nov 12, 2009 13:39:39 GMT -5
The Cavaliers would like to offer Grant an offer of: 2009/2010: $2,500,001 2010/2011: $2,750,0002011/2012: $3,000,000 2012/2013: $3,500,000 Total: $11,750,001 MLE Used 09/10 Total Salary: $70,983,633 10/11 Total Salary: $65,849,553 11/12 Total Salary: $36,800,000 12/13 Total Salary: $24,500,000 Mr. Hill would most likely come in and start at SG for us. Our team lacks veteran leadership, and Grant definitely provides that for our team to compete this year. His ability to start at SG completes our starting lineup, moving J.R. Smith to the bench to play a 6th man role. Grant gets the option to leave after a year if our competitiveness does not live up to its capability, and if he wants to move on to bigger and better things. Priority List: Wilson Chandler - Grant Hill Grant accepts Cleveland's offer and is excited to return to the East.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 13, 2009 1:46:23 GMT -5
Um..He doesn't have the room to sign anyone. He has 15 players and didn't say who he would cut if he signed Hill even after I told him more than once.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 13, 2009 3:29:21 GMT -5
The Nets would like to modify the offer in light of Cleveland not having the room...
09/10: $3,000,000 10/11: $3,500,000 11/12: $4,000,000 (team option)
3 years / $10,500,000
1. Artest 2. Hill
|
|
|
Post by mark - former NYK on Nov 13, 2009 6:19:41 GMT -5
The New York Knicks would like to offer Grant Hill a 3 year deal worth $12,000,000
Year 1: $3,500,000 Year 2: $4,000,000(PO) Year 3: $4,500,000(PO)
Total: $12,000,000
Team Salary per year without Hill 2009- $48,218,700 2010- $38,118,700 2011- $24,449,161
will release cook upon signing
|
|
|
Post by Oklahoma City Thunder on Nov 13, 2009 15:56:01 GMT -5
The OKC Thunder would like to increase our offer Grant Hill (using our MLE).
Year 1 $5,800,000 Year 2 $5,800,000 (team option) Year 3 $5,800,000 (player option)
3 year, $17,400,000 contract
1. Villenueva 2. Anderson 3. Hill
|
|
|
Post by oden52 - former CLE on Nov 13, 2009 18:41:03 GMT -5
Um..He doesn't have the room to sign anyone. He has 15 players and didn't say who he would cut if he signed Hill even after I told him more than once. I only have 14.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 13, 2009 20:35:53 GMT -5
Um..He doesn't have the room to sign anyone. He has 15 players and didn't say who he would cut if he signed Hill even after I told him more than once. I only have 14. No, and I already told you there are 15 players on your team and any bid MUST include a player that will be waived to be valid. You had 15 players and made a 2 for 2 trade. That still means you have 15 players.
|
|
|
Post by oden52 - former CLE on Nov 14, 2009 0:37:52 GMT -5
Well then I'll cut someone? Because my roster page only lists 14, and that's what I've been going off of the whole time.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 14, 2009 4:05:36 GMT -5
Well then I'll cut someone? Because my roster page only lists 14, and that's what I've been going off of the whole time. Ok, those are updated last (salary database first). You go by the salary database first and foremost. You have Haislip on your roster. He exercised his player option.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Nov 15, 2009 17:42:22 GMT -5
In that case, Cleveland will have 1 day to release a player.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 15, 2009 21:27:40 GMT -5
In that case, Cleveland will have 1 day to release a player. Um, no. He KNEW he had 15 players on his roster and I told him exactly what he needed to do to be able to bid on players and he DIDN'T do it. Hill will be revisited with the new offers and ONLY if the player agent decides that Cleveland is still the destination will he be going to Cleveland.
|
|
|
Post by oden52 - former CLE on Nov 15, 2009 21:40:43 GMT -5
In that case, Cleveland will have 1 day to release a player. Um, no. He KNEW he had 15 players on his roster and I told him exactly what he needed to do to be able to bid on players and he DIDN'T do it. Hill will be revisited with the new offers and ONLY if the player agent decides that Cleveland is still the destination will he be going to Cleveland. Umm, no I didn't. I was checking my roster with my roster page, thinking that it was correct. I had just switched to Cleveland, and was not sure of their roster at all. No one told me that I had Haislip on my roster, and you didn't make that clear in your PM either. You told me I was over the roster, so I thought you would've at least updated my roster page, which I checked, and since it wasn't updated, I didn't know what to do.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Nov 15, 2009 21:54:23 GMT -5
Um, no. He KNEW he had 15 players on his roster and I told him exactly what he needed to do to be able to bid on players and he DIDN'T do it. Hill will be revisited with the new offers and ONLY if the player agent decides that Cleveland is still the destination will he be going to Cleveland. Umm, no I didn't. I was checking my roster with my roster page, thinking that it was correct. I had just switched to Cleveland, and was not sure of their roster at all. No one told me that I had Haislip on my roster, and you didn't make that clear in your PM either. You told me I was over the roster, so I thought you would've at least updated my roster page, which I checked, and since it wasn't updated, I didn't know what to do. LEAGUE SALARY DATABASE...team options and players option which BOTH were clearly posted. If you didn't know then you should have. The info was there and it was clear.
|
|