|
Post by washington - former WAS on Jun 2, 2008 15:09:54 GMT -5
1 Year 500k
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Mavericks on Jun 2, 2008 15:12:08 GMT -5
haha-might i ask why JU-HO is still a 71? Interesting
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Jun 2, 2008 16:32:40 GMT -5
He's actually a 64
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jun 2, 2008 16:43:28 GMT -5
hahaha
|
|
|
Post by washington - former WAS on Jun 2, 2008 17:32:53 GMT -5
If he's not a 71 I don't want him.. He's a 71 in the thread therefore I want him.
I need a big man off the bench.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jun 2, 2008 17:46:30 GMT -5
What thread are you talking about? Both free agent threads, the one I moved and the one I just made, had him listed as a 64.
|
|
|
Post by washington - former WAS on Jun 2, 2008 17:47:29 GMT -5
It had him listed as a 71. Just saying when I looked at it. He was a 71 in the thread.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jun 2, 2008 17:49:16 GMT -5
Again, what thread. If you look at the one I moved to 2007/2008 it has him listed as a 64. If you look at the current thread it has him listed as a 64.
|
|
|
Post by washington - former WAS on Jun 2, 2008 17:51:18 GMT -5
I swear it had him as a 71. Somebody must have changed it because it had him on the top as a 71 whenever it was posted. Why would I make something up?
Oh I want Juwon Howard for one year because he's the best. I just needed a big man off the bench and it had him as a 71l.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Jun 2, 2008 20:13:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jun 3, 2008 2:01:19 GMT -5
Oh, it must be a 71 in game. Must have missed it.
|
|
|
Post by oden52 - former CLE on Jun 3, 2008 18:42:15 GMT -5
He accepts. Update your charts ASAP.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jun 3, 2008 19:06:02 GMT -5
so he's a 71? alright.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Jun 3, 2008 22:10:32 GMT -5
No, he's a 64. The previous list has him as a 64 but the game had him as a 71. The game didn't keep his rating. I guess this will be brought up before the council.
|
|