|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 20, 2009 13:01:49 GMT -5
At a first view, I like 2k10 a LOT better than Live. I love that the assist leaders are in the 10's, as opposed to the 8's. And CP3 for example getting about 6 apg in live, is now getting almost 9. I do think it's still a little low for him, and there are other individual stats that I think we might need to look at (individual attributes I mean - Tyrus Thomas leading the league in blocks?), but overall, 2k10 looks like the way to go for me.
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Dec 20, 2009 14:38:25 GMT -5
first off kudos to NJN for doing all of the hard work, we appreciate it.
Second nice job by 2K with the statistics and the realism this year, in the past every thing was whack, this year it looks somewhat realistic.
I think we should give 2k a shot, if it fails we can always turn back to Live.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Dec 20, 2009 21:02:32 GMT -5
I wouldn't be opposed to a switch, it'd make this league something different compared to other leagues. Why not give it a try?
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 0:15:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 0:18:52 GMT -5
I don't understand the success of the Clippers. I looked at the player stats for both the Clippers and the Suns and it just doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by humongousgravy - former PHL on Dec 21, 2009 1:39:00 GMT -5
Yao is much better on Live, about 9 ppg better!
Edit: How will the ratings be changed? Since they use different rating systems...
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 2:34:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 2:36:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 2:40:38 GMT -5
Yao is much better on Live, about 9 ppg better! Edit: How will the ratings be changed? Since they use different rating systems... Already have been changed. We use the league's ratings. There is no way I'm going to try and use comparable ratings. Waaaaaay too much work.
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 3:59:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 21, 2009 21:59:57 GMT -5
I like the results and the chance for mediocre teams to have a shot at the playoffs even if it is a slim chance. The player stats and award outcomes seem more than reasonable. 2k10 will be the sim engine used for the upcoming 09/10 season.
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Dec 22, 2009 10:24:18 GMT -5
I HAVE AWOKEN A SLEEP GIANT, KINGS JAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Dec 22, 2009 15:24:56 GMT -5
it's amazing the same guys are winning it
LBJ AK-47 L. Williams or A. Randolph Van Gundy, Woodson, or Spoelstra B. Griffin or T. Evans
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Suns on Dec 22, 2009 16:48:55 GMT -5
How the hell did I finish last in my division but the Clippers won?
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Dec 22, 2009 22:57:22 GMT -5
I HAVE AWOKEN A SLEEP GIANT, KINGS JAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Haha, I think we need to take a look at some of his attributes, 3 blocks and 2 steals a game are getting way out of hand, especially with 12.2 boards a game?!?!
|
|
|
Post by Miami Heat on Dec 22, 2009 23:37:48 GMT -5
I HAVE AWOKEN A SLEEP GIANT, KINGS JAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Haha, I think we need to take a look at some of his attributes, 3 blocks and 2 steals a game are getting way out of hand, especially with 12.2 boards a game?!?! Don't get mad get glad! He's 23, King James, the MVP baby wohooo! www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsG5uq9xOKo
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Dec 23, 2009 2:13:48 GMT -5
i would stay with nba live...now we all know the ratings and stuff...
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Nets on Dec 23, 2009 2:30:22 GMT -5
i would stay with nba live...now we all know the ratings and stuff... We would be using the same ratings. That isn't an issue.
|
|
|
Post by Orlando Magic on Dec 23, 2009 5:20:50 GMT -5
i would stay with nba live...now we all know the ratings and stuff... We would be using the same ratings. That isn't an issue. ok so you edit every rating? i just checked the nba2k ratings...they are quiet weird: Nate Robinson overrated 78, Redick a low 52, Dirk (MVP!) only 83, Garnett overrated 89...
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Dec 23, 2009 9:19:32 GMT -5
We would be using the same ratings. That isn't an issue. ok so you edit every rating? i just checked the nba2k ratings...they are quiet weird: Nate Robinson overrated 78, Redick a low 52, Dirk (MVP!) only 83, Garnett overrated 89... Dirk at 83 is a little low but NO WAY IN HELL is Garnett Over-rated. He doesnt put up 20-10 numbers often anymore because he's in the celtics. Dude, ratings are not based solely on numbers alone.
|
|